Policies and Guidelines
Research policies and guidelines serve as the foundation for institutional integrity, compliance, and operational excellence in academic and research environments. These frameworks establish clear expectations, standardize procedures, and ensure adherence to legal and ethical requirements while supporting the university's research mission.
Effective research policies reflect a balance between enabling innovative investigation and maintaining necessary oversight. Well-crafted guidelines protect the interests of multiple stakeholders—including researchers, subjects, institutions, funding agencies, and the public—while promoting transparency, accountability, and responsible conduct. They also establish mechanisms for addressing potential breaches and resolving conflicts that may arise during research activities.
Research administration staff play a crucial role in the implementation, monitoring, and evolution of these policies. As both interpreters and enforcers of institutional directives, staff members must develop comprehensive understanding of regulatory frameworks at federal, state, and institutional levels. This expertise allows them to provide valuable guidance to researchers while ensuring compliance with increasingly complex requirements from funding agencies and regulatory bodies.
The scope of research policies typically encompasses several key domains. Research integrity policies address issues such as misconduct, data management, and publication ethics. Compliance policies cover areas including human subjects protection, animal welfare, biosafety, export controls, and conflict of interest. Administrative policies establish procedures for proposal submission, award management, budget administration, and intellectual property. Together, these policies create a comprehensive framework that supports the responsible conduct of research.
Effective policy implementation requires regular review and adaptation to evolving research landscapes. Administrative staff must stay current with changing regulations, emerging ethical considerations, and developing best practices. Many institutions establish formal review cycles and stakeholder engagement processes to ensure policies remain relevant and responsive to the research community's needs.
Technology plays an increasingly important role in policy administration. Electronic systems for protocol review, conflict disclosure, and compliance monitoring enhance efficiency while providing improved documentation and oversight capabilities. These systems can streamline administrative processes while reducing burden on both researchers and staff.
Perhaps most importantly, successful policy frameworks recognize that compliance ultimately depends on creating a culture of research integrity throughout the institution. Administrative staff contribute to this culture not just through monitoring and enforcement, but by serving as educators, facilitators, and partners in the research enterprise. Through training programs, consultation services, and collaborative problem-solving, they help transform policies from external requirements into shared community values.
Additional Resources
- Stanford Research Policy Handbook: https://doresearch.stanford.edu/policies/research-policy-handbook
- Office of Research Integrity - Institutional Policy: https://ori.hhs.gov/institutional-policy
- UC Davis - Policies & Regulations: https://research.ucdavis.edu/research-support/policies-regulations/
- MIT Office of the VP for Research - Policies and Procedures: https://research.mit.edu/research-policies-and-procedures
- Harvard University - Research Compliance Policies: https://research.fas.harvard.edu/policies/research-compliance
- Go FAIR: FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- The Menlo Report (2012): Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research
- ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (PDF)
- UC San Diego Principles of Community
- UC Statement on Ethical Values (PDF)
- UCOP Electronic Communications Policy
- UCOP Policy on Integrity in Research (June 26, 1990)
- UC San Diego Integrity of Research Policy and Procedures PPM 100-4
- JSOE Singapore Statement
- JSOE Whistleblowing
- University Policies
- Ethics Education Library, Illinois Institute of Technology
- National Center for Professional & Research Ethics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- Office of Research Integrity, ORI
- Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Research, National Academy of Engineering
- Project for Scholarly Integrity, Council of Graduate Schools
- Resources for Research Ethics Education, UC San Diego
- Responsible Conduct of Research for Postdocs, National Postdoctoral Association