Wednesday, July 21, 2004
| Topic: |
Traversing An Ethical Minefield: The Continuing Stem Cell Debate |
| Presenter: |
Evan Snyder, Professor & Director
Stem Cell & Regeneration Program
The Burnham Institute |
| Location: |
Medical Teaching Facility (MTF) 175 |
Presentation
Abstract
: |
Scientists believe that stem cell research offers great promise for understanding and harnessing the power of cells to regenerate and repair themselves, thus opening the door to cures for a range of debilitating diseases, including diabetis, Parkinson's, MS, ALS and heart disease.
Despite its far-reaching clinical potential, stem cell research continues to elicit strong public opposition. Critics argue that the destruction of early stage embryos is ethically impermissible, even to advance medically worthy ends. |
Discussion
Questions: |
Dr. Snyder will examine the current state of the stem cell debate with attention to the following issues:
- What kind of moral consideration is owed the early embryo?
- At what point in its development does a human organism deserve full moral respect (equal that of an adult human being or a child)?
- Is convergence possible among the differing points of view on the status of the human embryo? How effective a "compromise" Is the Bush policy restricting public funding to stem cell lines established before the announced cut off date?
- What are the aims of the California Stem Cell Initiative and is it likely to pass?
|
Discussion
Summary: |
|
| Readings: |
- Snyder, E.Y. (et al). "Taking Stock and Planning for the Next Decade: Realistic Prospects for Stem Cell Therapies for the Nervous System." Journal of Neuroscience Research, v.76. 2004. pp. 157-168.
- Rothstein, J.D. (et al)." Reality and immortality - neural stem cells for therapies." Nature Biotechnology, 22 (3). 2004. pp. 283-285.
|
|