Home
About Us
Search
Site Map
Contact Us
Research Ethics Program
Courses
Seminar Series
Resources
What's New?
Research Ethics Journal Club
Back to Calendar 2007

 March 7 , 2007

Topic: Academic Codes of Ethics: Separate, Combined, or Aligned?
Presenter: Tricia Bertram Gallant, Ph.D., Academic Integrity Coordinator, UCSD
Location: SDSU Foundation: Sky Park
Discussion: Universities typically have up to three discreet codes of ethics for academic conduct: one for students, one for faculty, and one for researchers. Sometimes, faculty conduct (whether in the classroom or in the laboratory/field) is guided by one code, but student academic misconduct is always separate and often subsumed under a more general student conduct code that serves to also guide non-academic student conduct such as excessive drinking and noise.

This possibly arbitrary separation of student academic conduct from faculty or researcher academic conduct seems to be grounded in three assumptions:
1) problems with student academic conduct are assumed to be a result of students behaving badly, rather than a result of complex ethical dilemmas;
2) student academic misconduct is unrelated to the academic culture and the notion of professional ethics; and
3) the handling or discipline of students behaving badly is the jurisdiction of student affairs professionals, rather than faculty or the academic side of the house.
Discussion Questions:
  1. What are, if anything, the differences between the ethical academic conduct of students, versus that of faculty and/or researchers?
  2. Should universities continue to frame and respond to student academic misconduct differently from the framing and responding to faculty academic or research misconduct?
  3. What might a universal academic code of ethics, framed by a sense of professional ethics for all university members, look like?
Readings: