 June 14, 2006
| Topic: |
The gray zone: when does research begin? |
| Presenter: |
Camille Nebeker, Director
Division of Research Affairs
Graduate and Research Affairs
Principal Investigator, Project TRES
San Diego State University |
| Location: |
SDSU Foundation: Sky Park |
| Discussion: |
Camille will present the following articles and initiate discussion to compare medical, public health and ethnographic perspectives on determining when research actually begins and associated ethical issues. |
| Readings: |
- Research vs. public health practice: when does a study require IRB review?
Preventive Medicine, Volume 36, Issue 2, February 2003, Pages 250-253.
Paul J. Amoroso and John P. Middaugh
- Ethics of innovative surgery: US surgeons’ definitions, knowledge, and attitudes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Volume 200, Issue 1, January 2005, Pages 103-110.
Angelique M. Reitsma and Jonathan D. Moreno
Additional reading - copies will be available at the meeting:
Study’s need for IRB approval. By: Fassett, William E.; Hazlet, Thomas K. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 4/1/2006, Vol. 63 Issue 7, p614, 1p; DOI: 10.2146/ajhp050466; (AN 20254507)
Note: This link is to San Diego State University - Library and Information Access, available only to SDSU faculty, staff, and students.
|
|
